June 30, 2007
India’s Removal From GSP Is Good Conditioning For What’s Already Coming
Posted by Vinod Kuriyan under Diamonds, Government, India, JewelleryIt was inevitable and the Indian gem and jewellery export production industry was braced for it, and now it’s here. The United States announced that India, Brazil, Thailand, Venezuela and the Philippines, among others, would be removed from the generalized system of preferences (GSP) that hitherto ensured several categories of goods exported by these nations could be imported duty-free into the US. Jewellery from India and Thailand were among the goods that entered the US duty-free.
What this means is that US consumers will now pay 6% more for all jewellery that is made in India. Put another way, the import bill for the $2.21 billion in Indian-made jewellery that the US consumed last year would now be almost $2.34 billion. Add to this the fact that the rupee has been steadily appreciating against the dollar over the last couple of years – analysts are already saying that the rupee, which today trades at 40 to the dollar, could move up to 30 to the greenback in two years – and suddenly, the price competitiveness of Indian jewellery is under serious threat.The removal from the GSP list has its roots in an acrimonious dispute between the US and India and Brazil over farm subsidies that ended particularly nastily at the recent Potsdam negotiations. The US has long wanted the developing countries to open up their economies to farm-sector imports. Brazil and India, for their part, wanted the US to end its heavy subsidies to the farm sector before considering such a move. The agricultural issue has impeded progress in the latest round of World Trade Organisation (WTO) talks for a couple of years now. A while ago, US lawmakers decided to remove these countries from the GSP list in retribution. A formal review of the system was completed recently and it was clear that Indian jewellery was going to come off the list.
In general though, India’s economic prosperity has seen the rupee appreciate against the dollar at an annual rate of 3% between 2003 and 2006. It’s also been appreciating against other currencies. The Economist Intelligence Unit reports on Economist.com that in January-May 2007, the rupee’s value in terms of pounds, euros and yen rose by 8%, 6.9% and 11.2%, respectively. This, as the Economist notes, is inevitable and something of an enviable position to be in. The rupee can’t be shackled and kept artificially depressed. It will appreciate further.
The Indian diamond processing industry realizes that the strengthening rupee will also mean a loss of market share to other cutting centres – primarily China – as this continues. They know that they will have to become more vertically integrated and offer added value by other means in order to survive and thrive in the future.
So while the removal from the GSP list is something of a shock to the system, it is, in fact, only a precursor to further erosion of India’s price competitiveness in overseas markets. The Indian gem and jewellery export production industry will, in any case, have to change its price-competitiveness game plan as the rupee continues to strengthen. The new strategy will have to be very innovative. The Italian jewellery industry has realized that even unmatched design and quality was not enough to stop its loss of market share as its price competitiveness went out of the window.
The way I see it, the new strategy will have to do with how consumer specifications are matched. It will mean more direct communication with the end consumer and it will mean turning away from simple, high-volume mass production to more specialized batch processing for specific markets. It will all be very different.
July 2, 2007 at 2:33 pm
It is correct that Indian jewellery has to surpass the wholesaler chain and should reach to retailers or end user. This way, we could manage the existence in USA as had been earlier.
July 2, 2007 at 4:59 pm
Price Competitiveness can last for only so long and it’s not a comfortable place to be for a long time. The Indian jewellery industry has to move ahead in the value chain and retail seems the best possible way ahead. We have to move fast yet be careful. This move will in a way benefit some diamond exporters as jewellery manufacturers from other countries are now at par in competing with India and demand will shift partially to these countries.
Am guessing Dubai might gain prominence as a destination.
Regards
Prakash Dedhia
ICICI Bank (Gems & Jewellery Industry)
9920489893
July 5, 2007 at 3:56 pm
In such a case isn’t it possible for an exporter with offices in other countries like Hong Kong to route his exports through another country that does have GSP privileges?
Can this method be adopted ?
Cordially
MAYUR KOCHAR Gemologist (GIA)
9819777482
(This comment has been edited for clarity. VK)
July 5, 2007 at 4:12 pm
Mayur,
You’re absolutely right. But the key is to route the exports through a country that does have GSP privileges. Imports into the US from Hong Kong face an import duty of some 6%. The Indian industry is considering exporting loose stones and jewellery findings to duty-free zones in countries like Russia and Ukraine (as well as others like them) for the jewellery to be completed and re-exported to the US. All the former Soviet Union states enjoy a duty-free relationship with Russia and the US. But this would mean the governments of those countries agreeing to the free zones being set up etc. This could take some time.
July 6, 2007 at 12:12 pm
Well, routing the goods from a GSP acceptable country wont work because GSP means country of origin, even if the goods are routed through Russia or Ukraine, the country of origin (manufacturing) would be India, hence GSP of Russia or Ukraine wont be applicable, friends please correct me if I am wrong !
July 6, 2007 at 12:17 pm
You’re right Vivek, we can’t just route the goods through another country. That’s why we have to send both diamonds and jewellery findings to a third country for stone-setting and finishing. The finished jewellery can then legitimately carry the “made in” tag of that country.
July 10, 2007 at 11:56 am
hi,
its true as businessmen we shall have 2 xplore all the above discussed options. but what about the govt. chipping in with some export benefits? after all its a labour intensive industry. & the value addition is entirely due to the labour input. when the govt. can consider the textile industry for such benefits, why not ours? skipping the wholesale chain may not be vialble for small companies.
July 12, 2007 at 11:31 pm
Hi,
I would guess that exporters/manufacturers would start focussing strongly on the local market. Would it not be benificial considering the fact that the Rupee is getting stronger against the $ and constantly rising gold prices are always working against the interests of exporters?